Tesco Hudl  vs Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2 

Released September, 2013

Tesco Hudl

  • 7"
  • 16 GB
  • WiFi
  • Android 4.2.2
Front view of Tesco Hudl
7.7 Out of 10
The Tesco Hudl comes with a quad-core CPU and 1GB of RAM - this is pretty good for a tablet at this price point, although it feels a little redundant.
by TechRadar (Mar, 2014)
VS
Released October, 2013

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2

  • 7"
  • 16 GB
  • WiFi
  • Android 4.2.2
Front view of Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2
7.8 Out of 10
The tablet is thin enough and light enough that it feels comfortable in your hands, and is particularly well-suited for book reading in portrait mode.
by The Verge (Sep, 2012)

TabletRocket Review Our evaluation of Hudl vs Fire HD 2

Performance

Processing power and speed

Passmark and BrowserMark

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Battery life

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from techradar.com

TabletRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Winner
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2 

TabletRocket recommends the Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2  based on its battery life.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tesco Hudl vs Kindle Fire HD 2

passmark Processor performance including multiple coresData courtesy Passmark

BrowserMark How fast does the web browser load pages

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Tesco Hudl

Reasons to consider the
Tesco Hudl

Report a correction
Faster web browser 1,731 vs 1,621 More than 5% better BrowserMark score
More cores Quad core vs Dual core Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Has a webcam 2 MP vs None Most tablets have a webcam; Video chat with other people
Has a rear camera 3 MP vs None Most tablets have a rear camera; Can be used like a point-and-shoot camera
Supported card formats microSD vs None Supports supported card formats
Has a microphone jack Yes vs No Somewhat common; Can use an external microphone for superior audio quality
Sharper screen 242 ppi vs 215 ppi Around 15% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Higher resolution 1440 x 900 vs 1280 x 800 More than 25% higher resolution
Smaller 192.8 x 128.8 x 9.8 mm vs 239 x 163 x 8.8 mm Around 30% smaller
Front view of Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2

Reasons to consider the
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2

Report a correction
Has a light sensor Yes vs No Somewhat common; Automatically adjust screen brightness for environmental factors
Has a built-in microphone Yes vs No Somewhat common; No need for an external microphone
Longer battery life 11 hour vs 9 hour More than 20% longer battery life; surf the web longer without having to plug in
Thinner 8.8 mm vs 9.8 mm More than 10% thinner

Reviews Word on the street

Tesco Hudl  vs Kindle Fire HD 2 

8.0
8.0
The Hudl's is far from the best 7-inch display we've ever seen, and it doesn't hold a candle to the latest Nexus 7's 1920 x 1200 screen.
Tesco Hudl

Specifications Full list of technical specs

display

Tesco Hudl  vs
Kindle Fire HD 2 
Size 7" 7"
Technology IPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution 1440 x 900 1280 x 800
PPI 242 ppi 215 ppi

network

Wi-Fi
802.11n
802.11a
802.11g
802.11b
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v4.0
Supports 3G No No

processor

Cores Quad core Dual core
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz

sensors

Has a GPS Yes Yes
Has a compass Yes Yes
Has an accelerometer Yes Yes
Has a gyroscope Yes Yes
Has a light sensor No Yes

storage

Tesco Hudl  vs
Kindle Fire HD 2 
Internal storage 16 GB 16 GB
RAM capacity 1 GB 1 GB
Supported card formats
microSD
Maximum capacity 128 GB N/A

photo & video

Adobe flash support No No
Webcam 2 MP None
Rear camera 3 MP None

ports

USB support Micro USB 1 USB 2.0
Hdmi support Micro HDMI 1 HDMI
Has a headphone jack Yes Yes
Has a microphone jack Yes No
Has a built-in microphone No Yes

form factor

Weight 370 g 395 g
Size 192.8 x 128.8 x 9.8 mm 239 x 163 x 8.8 mm
Thickness 9.8 mm 8.8 mm
Battery life 9 hour 11 hour
Tesco Hudl
Report a correction
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 2
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus