Samsung ATIV Tab  vs Asus Vivo Tab 

Released October, 2012

Samsung ATIV Tab

  • 10.1"
  • 32 GB
  • WiFi
  • Windows 8
Front view of Samsung ATIV Tab
8 Out of 10
As a result of this design decision, the Samsung ATIV Tab is a light 570g in weight, and just 8.9mm thick.
by TrustedReviews (Aug, 2012)
VS
Released July, 2012

Asus Vivo Tab

  • 11.6"
  • 64 GB
  • WiFi
  • Windows 8
Front view of Asus Vivo Tab
8.2 Out of 10
The screen's too small to make multitasking really useful, and since Asus had to make the dock the same size as the tablet, it's too small as well.
by The Verge (Oct, 2012)

TabletRocket Review Our evaluation of Tab vs Vivo Tab

Performance

Processing power and speed

ATIV Tab
n.d.
Vivo Tab
n.d.
Passmark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, BrowserMark and Sunspider 0.9.1

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

ATIV Tab
6.1
Vivo Tab
6.1
GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

ATIV Tab
9.6
Vivo Tab
10.0
Battery life

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

ATIV Tab
8.3
Vivo Tab
8.6
Reviews from phonearena.com, techradar.com, trustedreviews.com and reviews.cnet.com

TabletRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

ATIV Tab
8.0
Vivo Tab
8.2

Winner
Asus Vivo Tab 

TabletRocket recommends the Asus Vivo Tab  based on its battery life and reviews.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of ATIV Tab vs Vivo Tab

GLBenchmark 2.7 3D graphics performance

ATIV Tab
3.1 fps
Vivo Tab
2.8 fps

GLBenchmark 2.5 3D graphics performance

ATIV Tab
8.2 fps
Vivo Tab
8.2 fps

Differences What are the advantages of each

Back view of Samsung ATIV Tab

Reasons to consider the
Samsung ATIV Tab

Report a correction
Lighter 570 g vs 675 g More than 15% lighter
Significantly higher resolution front camera 5 MP vs 2 MP 2.5x higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people
Sharper screen 155 ppi vs 135 ppi Around 15% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Smaller 265.8 x 168.1 x 8.9 mm vs 294.2 x 188.8 x 8.7 mm Around 20% smaller
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jul, 2012 Release date 3 months later
Front view of Asus Vivo Tab

Reasons to consider the
Asus Vivo Tab

Report a correction
Much longer battery life 10.5 hour vs 8 hour More than 30% longer battery life; surf the web longer without having to plug in
Much higher resolution rear camera 8 MP vs 1.9 MP Around 4.2x higher resolution rear camera; Can be used like a point-and-shoot camera
Bigger screen 11.6" vs 10.1" Around 15% bigger screen
Faster processor 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster

Reviews Word on the street

ATIV Tab  vs Vivo Tab 

7.2
8.0
When it comes to personalization, Windows 8 isn't as deep as Android, but it's far better than what the iPad delivers.
Vivo Tab

Specifications Full list of technical specs

display

ATIV Tab  vs
Vivo Tab 
Size 10.1" 11.6"
Technology LCD Super IPS LCD2
Resolution 1366 x 768 1366 x 768
PPI 155 ppi 135 ppi

network

Wi-Fi
802.11n
802.11a
802.11g
802.11b
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v4.0
Supports 3G No No

processor

Cores Dual core Dual core
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz

sensors

Has a GPS Yes Yes
Has a gyroscope Yes Yes
Has a light sensor Yes Yes

storage

ATIV Tab  vs
Vivo Tab 
Internal storage 32 GB 64 GB
RAM capacity 2 GB 2 GB
Supported card formats
microSD
microSDHC
Maximum capacity 128 GB 128 GB

photo & video

Adobe flash support Yes Yes
Webcam 5 MP 2 MP
Rear camera 1.9 MP 8 MP

ports

Has a headphone jack Yes Yes

form factor

Weight 570 g 675 g
Size 265.8 x 168.1 x 8.9 mm 294.2 x 188.8 x 8.7 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.7 mm
Battery life 8 hour 10.5 hour
Samsung ATIV Tab
Report a correction
Asus Vivo Tab
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus