TabletRocket recommends the Asus VivoTab RT for those concerned with getting the most for their dollar.
Asus VivoTab RT vs Eee Pad Transformer TF300 |
Released December, 2012
Asus VivoTab RT
- 10.1"
- 64 GB
- WiFi 3G
- Windows RT
7.2 Out of 10
by The Verge (Oct, 2012)It also nearly doubles the weight of the setup — from 1.1 to 2.3 pounds — though it's still pretty light in either scenario.
VS
Released April, 2012
Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300
- 10.1"
- 32 GB
- WiFi 3G
- Android 4.0
7.6 Out of 10
by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)Its 12 GPU cores do provide some of the best performance in an Android tablet, but for sheer horsepower it can’t beat even the iPad 2’s A5 SoC, let alone the A5X in Apple’s third tablet.
TabletRocket Review Our evaluation of VivoTab RT vs Transformer TF300
Performance | |
Processing power and speed | |
| Passmark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, BrowserMark and Sunspider 0.9.1 | |
Graphics | |
3D and 2D graphics | |
| GLBenchmark 2.5 | |
Battery Life | |
How long will the battery last | |
| Battery life | |
Reviews | |
How do our trusted review sites rank these products? | |
| Reviews from techradar.com, trustedreviews.com, theverge.com and reviews.cnet.com | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
 |
| |||||
Asus VivoTab RT | | |||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of VivoTab RT vs Eee Pad Transformer TF300
GLBenchmark 2.5 3D graphics performance
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more expandable storage | 2,048 GB (SDXC) | vs | 128 GB (microSD) | 16x more maximum capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher resolution front camera | 8 MP | vs | 1.2 MP | Around 6.8x higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people | |||
| More storage capacity | 64 GB | vs | 32 GB | 2x more storage capacity; Holds more music, movies and photos | |||
| Much faster Bluetooth | 24 Mbit/s (Bluetooth v4.0) | vs | 3 Mbit/s (Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR) | 8x faster Bluetooth | |||
| More RAM | 2 GB | vs | 1 GB | 2x more RAM; Better able to run big apps with lots of content | |||
| Lighter | 535 g | vs | 635 g | More than 15% lighter | |||
| Thinner | 8.3 mm | vs | 9.9 mm | More than 15% thinner | |||
| Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2012 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| Smaller | 171 x 262.5 x 8.3 mm | vs | 263 x 180.8 x 9.9 mm | More than 20% smaller | |||
| Slightly faster processor | 1.3 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | Around 10% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster | |||
| |||||||
| Faster graphics | 12.9 fps | vs | 7 fps | Around 85% better GLBenchmark 2.5 score | |||
| Much higher resolution rear camera | 8 MP | vs | 2 MP | 4x higher resolution rear camera; Can be used like a point-and-shoot camera | |||
| Supports voice commands | Yes (Android 4.0) | vs | No (Windows) | Somewhat common; Can be operated hands free | |||
| Has an open source operating system | Yes (Android 4.0) | vs | No (Windows) | Somewhat common; Allows you the freedom to use your tablet however you like | |||
Report a correction
Reviews Word on the street
| VivoTab RT | vs | Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | |||
 | VivoTab RT | |||
Overall | Out of 10 | Out of 10 | ||
Specifications Full list of technical specs
display | VivoTab RT | vs | Eee Pad Transformer TF300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 10.1" | 10.1" | |
| Technology | Super IPS LCD2 | IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1366 x 768 | 1280 x 800 | |
| PPI | 155 ppi | 149 ppi | |
network | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
| 802.11n | |||
| 802.11g | |||
| 802.11b | |||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth v4.0 | Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR | |
| Supports 3G | Yes | Yes | |
processor | |||
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
form factor | |||
| Weight | 535 g | 635 g | |
| Size | 171 x 262.5 x 8.3 mm | 263 x 180.8 x 9.9 mm | |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.9 mm | |
| Battery life | 10.67 hour | 10 hour | |
storage | VivoTab RT | vs | Eee Pad Transformer TF300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal storage | 64 GB | 32 GB | |
| RAM capacity | 2 GB | 1 GB | |
| Supported card formats | |||
| SDXC | |||
| microSD | |||
| SDHC | |||
| SD | |||
| Maximum capacity | 2,048 GB | 128 GB | |
photo & video | |||
| Adobe flash support | Yes | Yes | |
| Webcam | 8 MP | 1.2 MP | |
| Rear camera | 2 MP | 8 MP | |
sensors | |||
| Has a GPS | Yes | Yes | |
| Has a light sensor | Yes | Yes | |
 Asus VivoTab RT  Report a correction |  Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Buy Now
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $236 | $479 | |
| Asus Transformer Book T100 vs Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $152 | $479 | |
| Asus Transformer Pad Infinity TF701T vs Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $38 | $479 | |
| Google Nexus 10 vs Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $174 | $479 | |
| Microsoft Surface RT vs Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $171 | $479 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 vs Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $480 | $479 | |
| HP SlateBook x2 vs Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $236 | $38 | |
| Asus Transformer Book T100 vs VivoTab RT | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $128 | $110 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A vs E | ||
| | VS | |
| $295 | $150 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch vs A 10.1 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| Asus MeMO Pad HD 7 vs Memo Pad 8 | ||
| | VS | |
| $150 | $38 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 vs S 10.5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $38 | $236 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 vs Asus Transformer Book T100 | ||
| | VS | |
| $236 | $236 | |
| Asus Transformer Book T100TA vs T100 | ||
| | VS | |
| $110 | $150 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab E vs A 10.1 | ||
